Tattoos – Oh How We HATE them!

Call us old fashioned, behind the times, traditional, or whatever you like, but WE HATE TATTOOS!. They just look so damn trashy. From the very beginning, we have always avoided working with girls that had large or easily visible tattoos. Yes, we have worked with a few otherwsie highly attractive girls that had one or two small tattoos that were not in readily visible locations (i.e. no ink on the chest/breast, arms, thighs, calf, etc.) – it had to be small, tasteful and easily hidden. But lately it is getting almost impossible to find a girl under the age of 30 or 35 that doesn’t have one, if not several, ugly tattoos plastered over prominant parts of her body. Over the last few years, we have turned down dozens of otherwise very attractive girls because they had tattoos on their arms, thigh, chest, etc. Like reality TV shows, tattoos seem to a extremely annoying fad that just will not go away. In a few years, it may be impossible to find a girl without tattoos, but until then, we are sticking to our guns. If you want to work for Imago Studios – no trashy ink!

16 thoughts on “Tattoos – Oh How We HATE them!

  1. @Sablesword – Piercings do not bother us quite as much, but we do avoid any unusual facial piercings (e.g., eyebrow, cheek, lips, grommets in the ears, etc.). Body piercings are less bothersome (e.g., nipples, belly button). Bur we do avoid body piercings through other parts of the body. A few years ago, it was faddish to get a bar piercing through the arm, usually the wrist. One or two girls we worked with had them and we hated working around them.

    @ The Dude – We agree that a thigh tattoo (or any leg tattoo above the ankle) is bad, but tattoos on the breasts-chest are the absolute worst in our opinion.

  2. Nothing turns me off more than a woman with a huge tattoo on her thigh. I’m a leg man and getting ink there is blasphemy. 🙂

  3. It’s piercings that really bug me. Tattoos I can tolerate, but I still agree that the smaller & fewer the better, and that no tattooing is the best of all.

  4. Cody has 2 or 3 small tattoos in areas that are not easily visible – as do a few other of our models.

  5. A little tattoo on the ankle or on the back is no problem, but extensive tattoos, which cover whole body parts (e.g. arms, thighs or belly) are really a turn off.

  6. Agreed! That’s why I love your web site = wholesome All-American girl next door types (which means no tattoos) and great legs!

    Stick to your guns about the no-tattoos – that is what will separate you from the others!

  7. Wow I am glad to see that I am not the only one that thinks that way. I think pretty much the same way when it comes to choosing my girlfriends, and hey!! I am not even that old (27).

  8. Agreed as well – in fact, this is one of the reasons I keep coming back to your wonderful website! Thanks for all that you do!

  9. I agree with this as well. One known girl in the industry decided to go with a full sleeve down her arm. She would have great for Willingly Helpess too, before the change.. Maybe it’s time to work with older women 🙂

  10. I’m not one to get in the way of self-expression, yet i would have to agree that the ink has gotten out of hand with respect to females and can become a turn-off imo (especially those with whole lines of text written on them). I’ve also noticed that tatoos becomes even less appealing on a woman once she hits 40 and above ,but I know no one who get inked thinks that way or that far ahead when the decide to get one.

Comments are closed.